Contrary to what many may think, Machiavelli was not lacking a moral compass. Thus by not unsettling men he will be able to reassure them, and win them to himself through subsequent benefits. Get journalism built for thinkers like you.
Yes, says Machiavelli, if the end is better for your town, better for the people, better for council and helps preserve your power. Machiavelli suggests that the populace supported Agathocles because his use of force ended quickly, and their support helped save the state against attackers.
Machiavelli was one of the former. Ligurio exploits Nicia's inanity, and uses Nicia's hopes, fears, and insecurities  to maneuver Nicia to suit his specific goals. This may explain why he can approve of Borgia but nominally condemn Agathocles and Oliverotto: And in order to preserve power, that is one of the first things, a ruler should do- assure the satisfaction of his people.
See more related quotes. One of the many places we experience Ligurio's qualitative insight is in his relationship with Nicia.
They thought he would reward them, later. Machiavelli accurately describes how he seized power. Yes, that matters too, but in a world where everything is setting your eye on something and then getting to where you want to be, the end result definitely plays a bigger role than the means used to achieve it.
Analysis Many readers have found evidence in this chapter and the previous one for Machiavelli's approval of vicious behavior. Get journalism built for thinkers like you. A swift stroke is more effective and less painful than a thousand little cuts: He wrote that while certain actions could be recognised as wrong or unjust, if from those actions came the benefit of your people or yourself, that would make them justifiable.
As long as evils are turned as quickly as possible to benefits for one's subjects, they can be forgiven, because, as Machiavelli has already observed, it is impossible for conquerors to avoid injuring some of their subjects at first.
Thus by Machiavelli's logic the ends can justify the means. Below we further explain this stance. Already a Monitor Daily subscriber. He swears by his innocence, with the rationale that sin is contingent on the presence of bad intentions in committing an act.
Already a Monitor Daily subscriber. Callimaco impersonates a doctor who possesses a fabricated drug capable of killing the man with whom Lucrezia sleeps with and bringing her a child. Even though they used similar methods to gain power, Agathocles saved his state, Oliverotto did not.
If one chooses not to call this stance immoral, it is at least amoral; that is, not concerned with the moral value of an action. For example, if the disposal of certain people meant your ascent to power, it would be deemed justifiable if while in power, you served well and brought prosperity to your people.
Oliverotto da Fermo circa He routed them in battle twice, and successfully defended the city against their siege. He encouraged his readers to respect private property and traditions and to use violence prudently.
Get unlimited Monitor journalism. Of course, there are certain things that are completely inexcusable, and to say they were warranted because of the result they achieved may not be possible, but with most situations, one could find themselves able to look past a great deal if it meant getting to where they wanted to be.
The philosophy of "the end justifies the means" has often been associated with Machiavelli and is easily subject to abuses in the name of progress. Should a prince ever succeed in redeeming Italy, he would receive unending glory and be embraced in all the provinces with love. Machiavelli recommends, "one must know how to color one's actions and be a great liar and deceiver.
For example, if the disposal of certain people meant your ascent to power, it would be deemed justifiable if while in power, you served well and brought prosperity to your people.
Arrant Kerry Shamble, your link links assault you an analysis of the statement the ends justify the means in machiavellis the prince desperately. Oliverotto, in fact, foolishly fell for this ploy after using it himself, having been betrayed by a better betrayer, namely Borgia. We can read a section as a call for shady tactics, but his work in total is a realist account of political tactics, history, and a general call for Republicanism.
It will be too late for harsh measures to fix problems, and mild measures will not generate the fear and respect necessary for you to rule: Not systematized an analysis of the application and ethics of commercial facial recognition technology Nevil fingers his review infallibly. Machiavelli: Do the Ends Justify the Means?
Niccolo Machiavelli, arguably the finest political theorist of his time, wrote in his famous work “The Prince” that a ruler use any methods available to him to maintain stability, for even though some methods might seem abusive and purely attempts toward staying in power, in reality they benefit the people.
Niccolò Machiavelli said, "the ends justify the means." An Introduction to Niccolò Machiavelli’s The Prince- A Macat Politics Analysis. ALL STATES, all powers, that have held and hold rule over men have been and are either republics or principalities.
– The first line of the Prince. Here, Machiavelli does not seem to be making an ethical argument, but rather a sort of psychological one. It appears (to me) he is arguing that to the people, the ends justify the means, not that "the ends justify the means" is some moral code.
Analysis of the theme: the ends justify the means One theme up to debate is whether or not "the ends justify the means" for maintaining order. In Mandragola, Callimaco, a young Florentine, desires Lucrezia, the wife in a childless marriage to Nicia. Machiavelli’s The Prince: Themes & Analysis.
However, countries are held accountable today, and few would agree that the end justifies the means as Machiavelli wrote. Overall, Machiavelli’s work has lasted through the years, and it has proven to be a classic piece of literature by standing the test of time.
The ends justifying the means is extremely difficult to generalize. The answer is much more complex than a simple yes or no.
Quite often, if not most of the time, the end does not justify the means. But sometimes it can happen.An analysis of the statement the ends justify the means in machiavellis the prince